The trust transfer must be within 90 of the formation argument


Serving California only 949-388-7779 & 925-957-9797

REBUTTAL ARGUMENT OF DANNY A. BARAK ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER
MR. BARAK: Your Honors, appellants recognized it’s a herculean task trying to reverse court — this Court from its original position that it held in Mendoza which the Court has — is not published currently, especially when one is not Hercules.
There are lot of courts that have just said we don’t like Glaski but their reasoning is unsound specifically because they don’t take into account what the — what the laws that they were basing their opinions on actually said.
Specifically, those three Glaski cases of Jenkins and Gomes that’s stated that you can state specific factual basis, Glaski provides one with that specific factual basis.
This idea that there’s no prejudice only matters when you’re talking about a technical glitch in the foreclosure process, that’s what Fontenot said. The idea that Kan doesn’t matter because it probably…

View original post 347 more words

Advertisements

About Here and Now

I rant about issues concerning foreclosure, real estate law and any topic of interest. Normally my day job is Fashion and Costume Design. I like writing and reading interesting subjects.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.