Lawsuit being filed against DHgate.com


IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Mario Kenny, et al

Plaintiff

vs Case #:,

Dhgate.com

Defendants

COMPLAINT FOR MONEY DAMAGES
CLASS ACTION IS BEING SOUGHT
JURY TRIAL REQUESTED.

Facts of the case:

Date of purchase: Dec 23th 2015

Amount paid: $242.00

Purchase Order #: 31912035

Tracking Number provided: RT308956682HK

Tracking website: http://www.17track.net

Type of payment: MasterCard

Country of Origin: China

Country of Shipping Destination: Miami Florida USA

Method of Shipment chosen by Buyer: DHL

Method of actual Shipment Chosen by Seller: HongKong Post

Name of Product: AntMiner Bitcoin Mining Machine

Website of Seller product: http://dg.dhgate.com/myaccount/order/orderdetail.do?act=editpost&rfxproductid=ff808081519a1b800151cb5b2a784a9e

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff alleges the following;

I purchased a Bitcoin Miner from a seller on the Dhgate.com Website on December 23rd 2015 for a total of $242.00. During the shipping process I selected and paid for DHL as the shipper and was told by the website that the delivery date will be by the end of December 2015.

Four days after payment was received by Dhgate.com I was given a tracking number RT308956682HK and told that my item would arrive as promised, however the date came and went I did not receive the item. I literally would look for every truck which came down my street hoping that I would receive my item.

I contacted the Dhgate.com by their chat room see Exhibit 1 to inquire about my package. I was then told that the item was shipped by HongKong post instead of DHL and that the item would arrive sometime between January 11th 2016 and January 28th 2016. I was furious but I had no choice as the item was already shipped by a different method chosen by me at the time of purchase.

With great reluctance I agreed to the new shipping date and method, soon after this I began to search the internet for the name of the Seller. I discovered that the company have had several client complaints on line by buyers worldwide. See Exhibit 2, I discovered buyers had alleged that the company have shipped empty packages, packages with bricks to a client in Australia and many other varied kinds of unfair treatment by the Defendants.

Further I ventured to check the tracking number using the website of the shipping carrier which Dhgare.com provided to me. I was in total shock to learn from the carriers website that the item was shipped a full 30 days before I actually ordered the item in question, the De4fandants admitted see exhibit 2 that the tracking number was a fake and that I needed to file a dispute and make a “proposal” for settlement. I was dumbfounded, to learn that I had to make a proposal when in fact the Defendants committed a fraud on my by error or with deliberation, the Defendants have a duty to fact check the information before disclosing such erroneous information to me as I paid in advance. I quickly realised that I was not going to get not even a box of bricks for my money.

I then contacted the supplier of the item to get my money or the item. I was told that I needed to change my complaint from fake shipping tracking number to any other option to get a refund. This is the subject of this lawsuit.

THE PARTIES

The Plaintiff is a private Bitcoin and AltCoin mining consortium head off-iced in Miami Florida. The Defendants are a selling website and a BitCoin mining machine shop, situated in China.

VENUE

The venue is proper as the Plaintiff purchased the item with a credit card in Miami Florida on line.

Advertisements

About Here and Now

I rant about issues concerning foreclosure, real estate law and any topic of interest. Normally my day job is Fashion and Costume Design. I like writing and reading interesting subjects.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Lawsuit being filed against DHgate.com

  1. Hi Mario, just a heads up:
    CIRCUIT COURTS. Courts whose jurisdiction extends over several counties or districts, and of which terms are held in the various counties or districts to which their jurisdiction extends. In several of the states, the name given to a tribunal, the territorial jurisdiction of which may comprise several counties or districts, and whose sessions are held in such counties or districts alternately.
    These courts usually have general original jurisdiction. Renshaw v. Reynolds, 317 Mo. 484, 297 S.W. 374, 376.
    The name of a former .system of courts of the United States, invested with general original jurisdiction of such matters and causes as are of Federal cognizance, except the matters specially delegated to the district courts. 1 Kent, Comm. 301-303.

    Interestingly, CIRCUIT is the acronym for Chivalry of Catholic Rules and Institutions of the Independent and Traditionalist Union. These have been abrogated from original jurisdiction courts to federal courts which are courts under the emperor;

    EMPEROR. The title of the sovereign ruler of an empire. This designation was adopted by the rulers of the Roman world after the decay of the republic, and was assumed by those who claimed to be their successors in the “Holy Roman Empire,” as also by Napoleon. “The sovereigns of Japan and Morocco are often, though with little propriety, called emperors.” 10 Encyc. Amer. (1929), p. 300.
    In western speech the former sovereigns of Turkey and China were called emperors. Cent. Diet.

    The title “emperor” seems to denote a power and dignity superior to that of a “king.” It appears to be the appropriate style of the executive head of a federal government, constructed on the monarchial principle, and comprising in its organization several distinct kingdoms or other quasi sovereign states; as was the case with the German empire from 1871 to 1918. “The proper meaning of emperor is the chief of a confederation of states of which kings are members.” Cent. Dict., quoting Encyc. Brit.

    “In general, an emperor is the holder of a sovereignty extending over conquered or confederated peoples, a king is ruler of a single people. Thus the ‘King of England’ is ‘Emperor of India.’ ” Webster’s New Int. Dict. Before the dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian empire in November, 1918, its monarch was known as the Emperor of Austria and King of Hungary.
    Black’s Law 4th Edition

    King Henry II instituted the custom of having judges ride around the countryside (“ride circuit”) each year to hear cases, rather than forcing everyone to bring their cases to London (see Assize of Clarendon).

    There was the long-standing difficulty involving the Church, which culminated in the murder of Thomas Becket, the Archbishop of Canterbury. The problem for the King was that the Church acted like an imperium in imperio, a “kingdom within a kingdom”, only partially subject to Henry’s laws if at all. The Church operated its own court system, which answered not to Henry but to the Pope; it was a large landowner and a powerful vested interest. Henry wished to establish a system of justice that would enlarge the power of the Crown at the expense of the clergy.
    Henry therefore promulgated various assizes (i.e., courts that convened in a town periodically, rather than being permanently established). The primary and most general one, the Assize of Clarendon was issued in 1166. Others, the “petty” assizes known respectively as the assize of novel disseisin, of mort d’ancestor, and of darrein presentment gave more specific relief.[1] The most popular one became the assize of novel disseisin, which in Law French meant something close to the “assize of recent dispossession”. Those who had been recently put out of their lands could recover the beneficial use of them by resort to this assize, which led to a then innovative method of trial. Twelve “of the more lawful men” of the locality were summoned by the king’s sheriff to determine, upon their own knowledge, who was entitled to the property. This innovative method of proceeding, the origin of the civil petit jury at common law, was aimed at the chaos introduced into property rights by crusade and civil war.

    Henry’s true measure of cleverness, though, is on display in his innovations in criminal justice. Henry appointed “justices in eyre,” the counterpart of circuit judges, to travel from town to town. When they arrived, they too called upon the sheriff to summon twelve free men from the surrounding areas. These twelve free men were a prototype of a grand jury. They were called to report under oath any accusations of crime they were aware of in the community. In theory, then as now, the grand jury only brought accusations; it did not find guilt or innocence. The crimes to be investigated were specified in the Assize of Clarendon to be robbery, murder or theft or anyone who has harbored a robber, murderer, or thief. To these the Assize of Northampton (1176) added counterfeiting, forgery, and arson. Minor crimes were specifically excepted so the new assizes concerned themselves with what would later be labeled “felonies.” – summarized from the following source:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assize_of_Clarendon

    An internal magazine for Prieure de Sion members is CIRCUIT the acronym for Chivalry of Catholic Rules and Institutions of the Independent and Traditionalist Union.

    The Prieure de Sion (Priory of Zion) was unknown to the general public until 1982 when a book co-authored by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, and Henry Lincoln came out. The book was entitled Holy Blood, Holy Grail and it offered historical proof that an organization called the Prieure de Sion was powerful and had existed since the time of the early crusades (1099 A.D.).

    Dr. Otto von Hapsburg, a descendent of the Merovingian’s, and a Knights of Malta, headed Pan-Europa, an organization that has been working toward a U.S. of Europe. Their logo was a Celtic cross in a circle. The first point in time that the Prieure de Sion can be pinpointed is when Jerusalem was captured by the Crusaders and an abbey of monks that Peter the Hermit had belonged to was established in a building called the Abbey of Notre Dame de Mont de Sion just outside of Jerusalem. This abbey had an order that was called the Ordre de Sion. Over the centuries the Ordre de Sion has developed into what we have today as the Prieure de Sion (Priory of Zion in English). Bear in mind that the Ordre of Sion was visible for several centuries but has been totally secret after the 13th century. It became semi-visible during the 1960s and 70s and became secret again in 1984. The group of monks that made up the original order were led by Ursus of the Merovingians. They were given a place at Orval in France until they apparently decided to move to the Holy Land. This order appears to have had the power behind the scenes to have been in the position to select who would sit on the throne at Jerusalem, and the initially selected their man Godfroi de Bouillon. The Ordre de Sion (Prieure de Sion) set up a military order called the Knights Templar. Louis VII of France became indepted to the Knights Templar, and in repayment of the help he had received he established some of the Ordre de Sion at the priory of St. Samson, along with establishing 26 men (2 groups of 13) at a small priory at the Mount of Sion, Orleans, France. In 1188, the Ordre de Sion let the Knights Templars apparently go their own way, which eventually was to trouble. The story of the Knights Templars is exceedingly interesting because it relates to the Satanic International Bankers of today. The Knights Templars became the first European wide International Bankers.

    How their story fits into everything would take to long to tell at this point. At that time period when the Knights Templars took off on their own, the Ordre de Sion became the Prieure de Sion, and also used the names Ormus and Rose-Croix, The Prieure de Sion is intimately connected to the creation and guidance of the Rosicrucian’s and Freemasons. In the Be Wise As Serpents book, chapter 12 it talks about how the Prieure de Sion set up the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry.

    Like

Comments are closed.