Based upon the evidence, the Court finds neither Wells Fargo nor Freddie Mac had the right to enforce the unendorsed note incorrectly


unnamed

a-bomb01

Based upon the evidence, the Court finds neither Wells Fargo nor Freddie Mac had the right to enforce the unendorsed note incorrectly described by Kozeny & McCubbin as evidence to “verify the debt which is owed.” This Court finds Freddie Mac did not obtain title to the instant property through the foreclosure sale and title to the instant property should be quieted in the name of Plaintiffs.
judgment.1-26-15

COUNT I
In Count II Plaintiffs seek both compensatory and punitive damages for wrongful foreclosure of their property by Defendant Wells Fargo. Based upon the facts presented at trial, including, but not limited to, the facts set forth herein, the Court finds the foreclosure sale of the subject property on August 15,2008, was wrongful.
. . .
The Court finds Plaintiffs sustained. actual damages as set forth hereinabove in the amount of NINETY-FIVE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED TWELVE DOLLARS AND THIRTY CENTS ($95,912.30).
. . .
Based upon the uncontroverted facts presented at trial, and including, but not limited to, the facts set forth hereinabove, the Court finds Plaintiffs are entitled to damages for emotional distress against Defendant Wells Fargo Home Mortgage,  in the amount of TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($200,000,00)…
. . .
Punitive Damages
The evidence established that Wells Fargo intentionally promised a reinstatement to Plaintiffs and told David Holm that no foreclosure sale would take place if he accepted the reinstatement. Mr. Holm immediately accepted the offer. but Wells Fargo deliberately ignored the reinstatement deal and, in an egregious and deceitful manner, intentionally foreclosed on David and Crystal Holm’s family home.
. . .
Based upon the facts presented at trial, and including, but not limited to, the facts set forth herein above, the Court finds Plaintiffs are entitled to punitive damages against Defendant Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., in the amount of TWO MILLION NINE HUNDRED FIFTY- NINE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED TWENTY· THREE DOLLARS ($2,959,123.00). Based upon the record, the Court finds this sum to be fair and reasonable and supported by clear and convincing evidence adduced at trial.

Advertisements

About Here and Now

I rant about issues concerning foreclosure, real estate law and any topic of interest. Normally my day job is Fashion and Costume Design. I like writing and reading interesting subjects.
This entry was posted in wells fargo home mortgage and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Based upon the evidence, the Court finds neither Wells Fargo nor Freddie Mac had the right to enforce the unendorsed note incorrectly

  1. Papergate says:

    Mario: Any chance you got the complaint too? Thanks!

    Like

  2. Papergate says:

    Folks, if we want to see more justice like this case please send a note of thanks and praise to Judge Elliott . . .

    R. Brent Elliott, Circuit Judge Division II
    Clinton County Courthouse
    207 North Main Street
    Plattsburg, MO 64477
    (816) 539-3731

    Like

  3. MARIO KENNY says:

    I wish I did have it

    Like

Comments are closed.