The Shell Game by Bank of America ; Ana v Bank of America

Published on Jan 5, 2015

The story of the three Notes.

Bank of America currently has in play, three distinct versions of a mortgage Note we signed back in 2005, with various California courts.

The first was submitted by BoA back in 2012 as “Proof of Claim” in our Chapter 13 Bankruptcy. This version purports to show one endorsement.
!. From the original “LENDER” Northern Pacific Mortgage Corporation (suspended by the SoS) to Countrywide Home Loans.

2. The second, again submitted as “Proof of Claim” in the same Bk. one year later in 2013. Shows three endorsements.
(a) The first endorsement, as described above.
(b) The second, C’wide Home Loans to C’wide Bank.
(c) The third, perhaps an allonge, C’wide Bank to Pay to the order of ____ .

The third version of the Note shows no endorsements and was submitted into evidence in our pending civil litigation against Bank of America in 2014.

Why three Notes? In this video I do my best to explain the story Bank of America is telling/selling to the courts… enjoy!


About Here and Now

I rant about issues concerning foreclosure, real estate law and any topic of interest. Normally my day job is Fashion and Costume Design. I like writing and reading interesting subjects.
This entry was posted in ana v bank of america, the shell game and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Shell Game by Bank of America ; Ana v Bank of America

  1. Giftoftruth says:

    Reblogged this on Giftoftruth United and commented:
    Thanks Mario; in peace


Comments are closed.