Dayana Castillo-Atallah Fashion Model for the Frockz ResortWear ™ Private Collection


White 100% cotton size 10

The Frockz Trot taken in a green background

Frockz and Pant 100% cotton size 10

Frockz To Trot

white Frockz in garden setting size 10

in a green setting with white cotton 100% size 10 made in America

White Cotton Garment on green

The Frocks Trot collection 100% Cotton size 10

White cotton Made in America on green back ground

Frockz Trot collection 100% cotton size 10

picture of Dayana on green in white Frockz Trot

The Frockz Trot 100% cotton garment size 10

Dayana is the Ambassador of this Private Clothing collection, the collection is made in Miami Florida United States of America.

 

The collection is made in a cottage industry setting by American workers for American Women, the quality is very high in keeping with the manufacturing standards of what American made clothing have historically been.

 

We proffer more than 35 years of on the job expertise in the business of Fashion,  and Costume Design  engineering, with a complete working understanding of the clothing industry.

 

We hope you  enjoy wearing our creations in the same manner as with the pride and humility we chose to manufacture and present our clothing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

Mario Kenny ™ House of Fashion and Costume Design in Miami Florida


White Cotton Garment on green

The Frocks Trot collection 100% Cotton size 10

I am an exclusive Fashion and Costume Designer in Miami I design and manufacture my original fashions and costumes for one of a kind client, by appointment.

 

A certain style of my work will be available to on line sales soon. I design the items with feeling and grace for the attractive, gratifying physically and especially extravagant woman.

 

I will feature a line that will be offered in certain local small shops.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Silk Neck Ties


just that you know, most neck ties for men are made of silk, sometimes polyester or acetate is also used of late. The silk ties comes in two kinds, printed silk or woven silk designs, woven silk is of better quality, normally.

There are two common manners to tie a neck tie, a simple method and a more complex uniformed method. Most men do not know how tie a tie properly, and many not at all.

Most silk especially woven silk comes from China, the Chinese have a 5000 year history of making the finest silk money can buy.

Silk is a very soft man-made natural fabric, all fabrics are man-made, some are derived from oil and others from natural fibre.

Google “how to tie a neck tie”, to learn this simple art.

Neck tie fabrics are some of the most detailed fabrics on the planet as neck ties are very small and must be very attractive in such a small dose.

I do not know who invented neck ties or why? you are not allowed to go to jail with a neck tie, and getting in a fist fight with a neck tie on is not a very good idea either.

More about ties that I know, a woven neck tie falls nicer its has a heavier fall which is important for a tie, a light weight tie is considered cheap. Remember a neck tie is really meant to please and or impress other people as the person dunning the darn tie can not see it.

All good ties have little small labels which tell of the fabric content, but most does not specify weather they are woven or printed, so this taste comes with experience only, sorry

Okay I did that coo

Posted in Silk Neck Ties | Tagged | Leave a comment

I am Mike Brown Live from Ferguson, MO


http://new.livestream.com/accounts/9035483/events/3271930/videos/59931210

Posted in I am Mike Brown Live from Ferguson, MO | Tagged , | Leave a comment

St. Louis County Police Reportedly Raid a Ferguson ‘Safe Haven’ Church, Confiscate Maalox Bob Cesca on August 21, 2014


St. Louis County Police Reportedly Raid a Ferguson ‘Safe Haven’ Church, Confiscate Maalox

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Grand Jury Hand Book Final-Common Law Handbook-2014


COMMON LAW HANDBOOK
FOR JURORS, SHERIFFS,
BAILIFFS AND JUSTICES
Justice and judgment are the habitation of thy
throne: mercy and truth shall go before thy face.
—Psalms 89:14
“Governments are instituted among Men,
deriving their Just powers
from the consent of the governed.”
—Declaration of Independence
“Men must be governed by God
or they will be ruled by tyrants.”
—William Penn
Copyright © 2014 National Liberty Alliance
Printed in the United States of America
ISBN 978-0-692-24363-3I
t is the duty of jurors, sheriffs, bailiffs
and justices to resist all infringements
upon the rights of the people without delay.
Thomas Jefferson said: “Whenever people are
well-informed they can be trusted with their
own government.” Clearly the government
cannot be in charge of deciding for themselves
whether or not they should indict themselves
on criminal charges. This is precisely why we
have so much corruption in our government.
It is the duty of the people to stand up as the
faithful and wise stewards (Luke 12:42), and
bring the servants who think themselves master
back into subjection.
COMMON LAW IS COMMON SENSE
The question each jurist must ask themselves is:
“Is there an injured party?” There is a Common
Law principle which states that for there to be
a crime, there must first be a victim (corpus
delecti); the state cannot be the injured party. In
the absence of a victim, there can be no crime.
This is what the grand jurist must discover.
“The constitutions of most of our states assert
that all power is inherent in the people; that
they may exercise it by themselves, in all cases
to which they think themselves competent, (as
in electing their functionaries executive and
legislative, and deciding by a jury of themselves,
both fact and law, in all judiciary cases in
which any fact is involved) or they may ask by
representatives, freely and equally chosen; that
it is their right and duty to be at all times armed;
to freedom of person; freedom of religion;
freedom of property; and freedom of the press.”
(Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Cartwright; June 5, 1824;
“The Thomas Jefferson Papers,” Library of Congress)
2GRAND JURORS [25]. It is the “DUTY”
of the Common Law Grand Jury to expose
all fraud and corruption whether it is in the
political or judicial realm and stop it! The
Authority of the Grand Jury is found only in the
Bill of Rights, therefore it comes from God and
not government.
AMENDMENT V. “No person shall be held
to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous
crime, unless on a presentment or indictment
of a Grand Jury….” It is in effect a fourth branch
of government “governed” and administered
to directly by and on behalf of the American
people.
TRIAL JURORS [12]. It is the duty of the Jury
to execute Justice and sometimes mercy, their
decisions cannot be second guessed. “…The jury
shall have the right to determine the law and
the fact.” ( New York Constitution Article 1. §8 )
“As understood at common law and as used
in constitutional provision, jury imports a body
of twelve men.” [State v. Dalton, 206 N.C. 507, 174
S.E. 422, 424; People ex rel. Cooley v. Wilder, 255
N.Y.S. 218, 222, 234 App. Div. 256; Hall v. Brown, 129
Kan. 859, 284 P. 396.]
JURY NULLIFICATION
“The jury has an unalienable right to judge both
the law as well as the fact in controversy.”
—John Jay, 1st Chief Justice
United States Supreme Court, 1789
“The jury has the right to determine both the law
and the facts.”
—Samuel Chase, Justice
US Supreme Court, 1796
Signer of the unanimous Declaration
3“The jury has the power to bring a verdict in the
teeth of both law and fact.”
—Oliver Wendell Holmes, Justice
US Supreme Court, 1902
Central to the history of trial by jury is the
right of jurors to vote “not guilty” if the law is
unjust or unjustly applied. When jurors acquit
a factually guilty defendant, we say that the
jury “nullified” the law. The Founding Fathers
believed that juries in criminal trials had a role
to play as the “conscience of the community,”
and relied on juries’ “nullifying” to hold the gov-
ernment to the principles of the Constitution.
“Trust in the jury is, after all, one of the
cornerstones of our entire criminal jurisprudence,
and if that trust is without foundation we must
re-examine a great deal more than just the
nullification doctrine.”
—Judge David L. Bazelon
There may be no feature more distinctive of
American legal culture than the criminal trial
jury. Americans have a deep and stubborn
devotion to the belief that the guilt or innocence
of a person accused of crime can only be judged
fairly by a “jury of his peers.” This notion is a
particularly American one, although it was
inherited from English common law during the
Colonial era.
KENTUCKY RESOLUTIONS.
A series
of resolutions drawn up by Jefferson, and
adopted by the legislature of Kentucky in
1799, protested against the “alien and sedition
laws,” declared their illegality, announced the
strict constructionist theory of the federal
government, and declared “nullification” to be
“the rightful remedy.”
4JUSTICE. It is the duty of the Justice to do
justice. In common law, the title Justice is given
in England to the judges of the king’s bench and
the common pleas, and in America to the judges
of the Supreme Court of the United States and
of the appellate courts of many of the states. In
the most extensive sense of the word, “justice”
differs little from “virtue,” for it includes
within itself the whole circle of virtues. Yet the
common distinction between them is that that
which, considered positively and in itself, is
called “virtue,” when considered relatively and
with respect to others has the name of “justice.”
But “justice,” being in itself a part of “virtue,”
is confined to things simply good or evil, and
consists in a man’s taking such a proportion of
them as he ought. [Bouvier]
THE SOURCE OF VIRTUE. Found in Luke
6:19: “And the whole multitude sought to touch
him: for there went virtue out of him, and
healed them all.”
Therefore a Justice is to reflect divine qualities,
as we read in Phil 4:8: “Finally, brethren,
whatsoever things are true, whatsoever
things are honest, whatsoever things are just,
whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things
are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report;
if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise,
think on these things.”
SHERIFF: TOP COP
“America will never be destroyed from the
outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will
be because we destroyed ourselves.”
—Abraham Lincoln
Justice Scalia, writing for the majority in
a 1997 decision, said that the “States are not
5subject to federal direction,” and that the US
Congress only had “discreet and enumerated
powers,” and that federal impotency was “ren-
dered express” by the Tenth Amendment. He
confirmed that the Sheriff is the Chief Law
Enforcement Officer (CLEO) of the county,
and also proclaimed that the States “retained an
inviolable sovereignty.” Scalia went even further
in this landmark decision, one in which two
small-town sheriffs headed the Feds “off at the
pass” and sent them on their way. Scalia, in his
infinite obligation to the Constitution, took this
entire ruling to the tenth power when he said,
“The Constitution protects us from our own
best intentions…so that we may resist the temp-
tation to concentrate power in one location as
an expedient solution to the crisis of the day.”
Obviously the Sheriff is the Peoples’ last line of
defense against a government gone rouge.
The county sheriff is the last line of defense
when it comes to upholding and defending the
Constitution. The sheriff ’s duties and obligations
go far beyond writing tickets, arresting criminals
and operating jails. The Sheriff also has an
obligation to protect the Constitutional rights
of the citizens in our counties. This includes the
right to free speech, the right to assemble, and
the right to bear arms. Remember the oath.
Sheriffs took an oath to uphold and defend
the Constitution from enemies foreign AND
domestic. In the history of our world, it is
government tyranny that has violated the
freedoms granted to us by our Creator more
than any other. And it is the duty of the sheriff
to protect their counties from those that would
take away our freedoms—both foreign AND
domestic—whether it is a terrorist from Yemen
or a bureaucrat from Washington, DC.
6BAILIFF. Officers who perform the duties of
sheriffs within liberties or privileged jurisdic-
tions, in which formerly the king’s writ could
not be executed by the sheriff. One to whom
some authority, care, guardianship, or jurisdic-
tion is delivered, committed, or entrusted; one
who is deputed or appointed to take charge of
another’s affairs; an overseer or superintendent;
a keeper, protector, or guardian; a steward.
(Spellman:. A sheriff ’s officer or deputy. 1 Bl. Comm.
34) ; A court attendant.
It is the duty of all above to correct injustice
in as much as it is in their power to do so. If
correction is not possible, it is the duty of the
court officer(s) to report the problem to the
protectors of the People—the Grand Jury—in
who’s’ hand justice has been entrusted.
UNITED STATES CODES
Remedy of the people when rights violated
THIS CONSTITUTION, and the LAWS OF
THE UNITED STATES which SHALL BE made
in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or
which shall be made, under the authority of
the United States, shall be the SUPREME LAW
OF THE LAND; and the JUDGES IN EVERY
STATE SHALL BE BOUND THEREBY, any-
thing in the Constitution or laws of any State to
the contrary notwithstanding.
MISPRISION OF TREASON—USC 18 §2382
Whoever having knowledge of treason,
conceals and does not make known the same
to some judge, is guilty of treason for contempt
against the sovereign, and shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than seven
years, or both.
7BRIBERY—USC 18 §201
Bribery of any public official directly or
indirectly, gives, offers, or promises anything of
value to any person to influence any official act.
CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS—USC 18 §241
If two or more persons conspire to injure,
oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in
any State in the free exercise or enjoyment of
any right, they shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS—USC 18 §242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute,
ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully
subjects any person in any State the deprivation
of any rights, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
CONCEALMENT—USC 18 §2071
Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals,
removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or
attempts to do so, documents filed or deposited
with any clerk or officer of any court, shall be fined
or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
CLERK IS TO FILE—USC 18 §2076
Whoever, being a clerk, willfully refuses
or neglects to make or forward any report,
certificate, statement, or document as required
by law, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS—USC 42 §1983
Every person who, under color of any statute,
ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any
State subjects, or causes to be subjected, any
person within the jurisdiction thereof to the
deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immuni-
ties secured by the Constitution and laws, shall
8be liable to the party injured in an action at law.
CONSPIRACY TO INTERFERE—USC 42 §1985
If two or more persons in any State or
Territory conspire for the purpose of depriving,
either directly or indirectly any persons rights
the party so injured or deprived may have an
action for the recovery of damages against any
one or more of the conspirators.
NEGLECT TO PREVENT—USC 42 §1986
Every person who, having knowledge that
any of the wrongs conspired to be done or are
about to be committed, and having power to
prevent or aid in preventing the commission of
the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such
wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the
party injured
ALL IS MINE. Job 41:11: “Whatsoever is
under the whole heaven is mine.” Ezekiel
18:4: “Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of
the father, so also the soul of the son is mine.”
Exodus 19:5: “Now therefore, if ye will obey
my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then
ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above
all people: for all the earth is mine.” Psalms
50:12: “If I were hungry, I would not tell thee:
for the world is mine, and the fullness thereof.”
Proverbs 8:14: “Counsel is mine, and sound
wisdom: I am understanding; I have strength.”
GOVERNMENT BY CONSENT
Our founders purposely placed the power
of the Grand Jury in the Bill of Rights to
make it clear that it belongs to the people,
and the government is not to violate it. It is
the “ultimate power” of the people which
allows them to consent or not to the actions
9of their servant government. It also prevents
government from unrighteous prosecutions
by forcing the government to seek permission
from the people before criminal charges can be
filed; if the people refuse it cannot go forward.
By understanding this principle it becomes
clear that the government has no authority to
control your behavior, and therefore neither do
legislators—without your consent.
The Declaration of Independence says:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that
all men are created equal, that they are endowed
by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and
the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these
rights, Governments are instituted among Men,
deriving their just powers from the consent of
the governed.”
ALL MEN DECIDE whether they want to
participate in the institutions of men or not. The
United States Supreme Court confirmed this
when they said: “…every man is independent
of all laws, except those prescribed by nature.
He is not bound by any institutions formed by
his fellowman without his consent.” (Cruden v.
Neale, 2 N.C. 338 May Term, 1796)
There are only three ways a court can hear
a criminal complaint: (1) One or more of the
people sign a sworn affidavit that they have
been injured; (2) A prosecutor, on behalf of the
government, brings an accusation before the
Grand Jury and the Grand Jury either indicts
or does nothing; (3) The Grand Jury by its
“own will,” can investigate merely on suspicion
that the law is being violated, or even because
it wants assurance that it is not; and if it finds
wrongdoing it can present it to the court and
10it must go to trial. No one can second guess
the Grand Jury, unless the Grand Jury’s actions
violate another’s unalienable rights.
Consent and Jurisdiction: it’s all about
Consent and Jurisdiction. In order to possess
liberty it is extremely important that you
understand consent: our servant government
cannot do anything without your consent.
Any authority our servants have is by our
consent; if they act outside their authority they
are subject to criminal charges under US Codes
42 and 18, and are liable for damages under US
Codes and common law.
The Fifth Amendment states: “No person
shall be held to answer for a capital, or other-
wise infamous crime, unless on a presentment
or indictment of a Grand Jury…,” therefore our
servant government requires the people to get
an indictment (grand jury). Judges (servant)
have no authority to make a ruling or a judg-
ment on people (master) without your consent.
In legal terms, when the judge asks you “do you
understand?” he means, do you stand under the
authority of this court? So, when you say “Yes,”
you just gave him/her jurisdiction over you!
Our U.S. Constitution only authorizes
“common law courts,” also known as “courts of
record.” A court of record removes the power
of the Judge to make a ruling; his role is that
of the “administrator” of the court. The final
decision maker is the “tribunal,” who is either
the “sovereign plaintiff ” or a “jury.” Remember,
the servant cannot rule over the master; can the
clay rule over the potter?
“…Every man is independent of all laws,
except those prescribed by nature. He is not
11bound by any institutions formed by his fellow-
man without his consent.” (Cruden v. Neale)
Herein is Liberty: if “YOU” do not give the
court consent, they have no “JURISDICTION”
over “YOU”!
Under US Codes 42 and 18, when you are
detained—without your consent—for violating
a statute, you have just been kidnapped; and if
the Judge sets a bail, he just set a ransom; and
when the prosecutor confirms the charges, they
are all part of a conspiracy, and “YOU” can put
them in jail and sue them for damages. It’s all
about Consent and Jurisdiction.
THE REAL LAW
The common law is the real law, the Supreme
Law of the land; the code, rules, regulations,
policy and statutes are not the law.
Legislated statutes enforced upon the people
in the name of law is a fraud. It has no authority
and is without mercy. Justice without mercy is
Godless, and therefore repugnant to our United
States Constitution. Lawmakers were given
authority by the people to legislate codes, rules,
regulations, and statutes which are policies,
procedures, and “law” to control the behavior
of bureaucrats, elected and appointed officials,
municipalities and agencies, but were never
given authority to control the behavior of the
people—as we read in a US Supreme court
decision: “All laws, rules and practices which
are repugnant to the Constitution are null and
void.” (Marbury -v-Madison, 5th US (2 Cranch)
137, 174, 176, 1803)
Legislators simply do not have the author-
ity to rule make. “Where rights secured by the
12Constitution are involved, there can be no rule
making or legislation which would abrogate
them.” (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491)
God breaks down the law as follows: “And
Jesus answered him, The first of all the com-
mandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our
God is one Lord: And thou shalt love the Lord
thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul,
and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength:
this is the first commandment. And the sec-
ond is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy
neighbour as thyself. There is none other com-
mandment greater than these” (Mark 12:29-31).
Although it is a sin, punishable only
by the Judge of the Universe, to break the
commandment to love in your mind, words, and
deeds. It does not become a crime punishable by
man until your words and deeds are expressed
in actions that injure another.
Thomas Jefferson said: “I would rather be
exposed to the inconveniences attending too
much liberty than those attending too small a
degree of it.”
If one of the people exercises his free will to do
such things as carry a weapon, travel, practice
law, park without depositing money in a meter,
use hemp, pharmaceuticals, alcohol, vitamins,
minerals or any other substance for medicinal
or recreational purposes, legislators do not have
the authority to impose upon the people a fine,
a license, or make such rights a crime.
RIGHTS AND SOVEREIGNTY
Only people are sovereign and have rights.
Bureaucrats, in their capacity, are not sovereign
and have no rights. They have authority given
13by the people and are subject to the statutes.
“The state cannot diminish rights of the people.”
(Hurtado v. People of the State of California, 110 U.S.
516)
“The assertion of federal rights [Bill of
Rights], when plainly and reasonably made,
is not to be defeated under the name of local
practice.” (Davis v. Wechsler, 263 US 22, 24)
“Where rights secured by the Constitution
are involved, there can be no rule making
or legislation which would abrogate them.”
(Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491)
“There can be no sanction or penalty
imposed upon one because of this exercise of
constitutional rights.” (Sherer v. Cullen, 481 F 946)
“Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to
law, for it is the author and source of law.” (Yick
Wo v. Hopkins, 118 US 356, 370). To deprive the
People of their sovereignty, it is first necessary
to get the People to agree to submit to the
authority of the entity they have created. That is
done by getting them to claim they are citizens
of that entity (see Constitution for the U.S.A.,
XIV Amendment, for the definition of a citizen
of the United States).
LICENSING LIBERTY
“No state shall convert a liberty into a
license, and charge a fee therefore.” (Murdock v.
Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105)
“If the State converts a right (liberty) into
a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license
and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with
impunity.” (Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham,
Alabama, 373 U.S. 262)
14REMEDY FOR EVERY INJURY
“Every right when with-held must have a remedy,
and every injury it’s proper redress.”
—William Blackstone
In the third volume of his Commentaries,
page 23, Blackstone states two cases in which
a remedy is afforded by mere operation of law.
“In all other cases,” he says, “it is a general and
indisputable rule that where there is a legal
right, there is also a legal remedy by suit or
action at law whenever that right is invaded.”
And afterwards, on page 109 of the same
volume, he says, “I am next to consider such
injuries as are cognizable by the Courts of com-
mon law. And herein I shall for the present only
remark that all possible injuries whatsoever
that did not fall within the exclusive cognizance
of either the ecclesiastical, military, or maritime
tribunals are, for that very reason, within the
cognizance of the common law courts of justice,
for it is a settled and invariable principle in the
laws of England that every right, when with-
held, must have a remedy, and every injury its
proper redress.” (5 U.S. 137, Marbury v. Madison)
“The Government of the United States has
been emphatically termed a government of
laws, and not of men. It will certainly cease to
deserve this high appellation if the laws furnish
no remedy for the violation of a vested legal
right.” (Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 1803)
“…That statutes which would deprive a citizen
of the rights of person or property without a
regular trial, according to the course and usage of
common law, would not be the law of the land.”
(Hoke vs. Henderson,15, N.C.15,25 AM Dec 677)
15“…The right to be let alone—the most
comprehensive of rights and the right most
valued by civilized men. To protect that right,
every unjustifiable intrusion by the government
upon the privacy of the individual, whatever the
means employed, must be deemed a violation
of the Fourth Amendment.” (Olmstead v. U.S.,
277 U.S. 438, 478, 1928)
COURT
The court belongs to the sovereign, plaintiff
(people). Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Edition,
page 318 defines the court as “The person and suit
of the sovereign; the place where the sovereign
sojourns with his regal retinue, wherever that
may be.” In the US Supreme Court case Isbill v.
Stovall, the court was defined as “An agency of
the sovereign created by it directly or indirectly
under its authority, consisting of one or more
officers, established and maintained for the
purpose of hearing and determining issues of
law and fact regarding legal rights and alleged
violations thereof, and of applying the sanctions
of the law, authorized to exercise its powers in
the course of law at times and places previously
determined by lawful authority.”
“Judicial notice, or knowledge upon
which a judge is bound to act without having
it proved in evidence.” (Black’s Law 4th edition)
Take Judicial notice that judges are bound by
oath to obey American Jurisprudence book.
JUDGES SWORN TO OBEY. “Since the
constitution is intended for the observance
of the judiciary as well as other departments
of government and the judges are sworn to
support its provisions, the courts are not at
liberty to overlook or disregard its commands
16or counteract evasions thereof, it is their duty
in authorized proceedings to give full effect
to the existing constitution and to obey all
constitutional provisions irrespective of their
opinion as to the wisdom or the desirability
of such provisions and irrespective of the
consequences, thus it is said that the courts
should be in our alert to enforce the provisions
of the United States Constitution and guard
against their infringement by legislative fiat
or otherwise in accordance with these basic
principles, the rule is fixed that the duty in the
proper case to declare a law unconstitutional
cannot be declined and must be performed
in accordance with the delivered judgment of
the tribunal before which the validity of the
enactment it is directly drawn into question.
If the Constitution prescribes one rule and the
statute another in a different rule, it is the duty
of the courts to declare that the Constitution
and not the statute governs in cases before them
for judgment.” (16Am Jur 2d., Sec. 155:)
LAW OF THE LAND
“This Constitution, and the laws of the United
States which shall be made in pursuance thereof;
and all treaties made, or which shall be made,
under the authority of the United States, shall
be the supreme law of the land; and the judges
in every state shall be bound thereby, anything
in the Constitution or laws of any State to the
contrary notwithstanding.”
—US Constitution
“…Thus, the particular phraseology of the
constitution of the United States confirms
and strengthens the principle, supposed to be
essential to all written constitutions, that a law
17repugnant to the constitution is void, and that
courts, as well as other departments, are bound
by that instrument.” After more than 200 years
this decision still stands. (Marbury v. Madison 5
U.S. 137, 1803)
All cases which have cited Marbury v.
Madison case to the Supreme Court have never
been overturned. (See Shephard’s Citation of
Marbury v. Madison)
The constitution was ordained and established
by the people “for” the United States of America,
aka government. Therefore government was
created by an act of the people. Therefore the
creation cannot trump the creator.
“If any statement, within any law, which is
passed, is unconstitutional, the whole law is
unconstitutional.” (Marbury v. Madison: 5 US 137,
1803)
“Therefore no legislation…that statutes
which would deprive a citizen of the rights
of person or property without a regular trial,
according to the course and usage of common
law, would not be the law of the land.” (Hoke vs.
Henderson,15, N.C.15,25 AM Dec 677)
“Where rights secured by the Constitution
are involved, there can be no rule making
or legislation which would abrogate them.”
(Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491)
INTERPRETATION.
Any constitutional
provision intended to confer a benefit should
be liberally construed in favor in the clearly
intended and expressly designated beneficiary.
“Then a constitution should receive a
literal interpretation in favor of the Citizen, is
especially true, with respect to those provisions
which were designed to safeguard the liberty
18and security of the Citizen in regard to person
and property.” (16Am Jur 2d: 16Am Jur 2d., Sec. 97;
Bary v. United States – 273 US 128 )
NO EMERGENCY HAS JUST CAUSE TO
SUPPRESS THE CONSTITUTION
“While an emergency cannot create power
and no emergency justifies the violation of any of
the provisions of the United States Constitution
or States Constitutions. Public emergency such
as economic depression for especially liberal
construction of constitutional powers and it
has been declared that because of national
emergency, it is the policy of the courts of times
of national peril, so liberally to construed the
special powers vested in the chief executive as
to sustain an effectuate the purpose there of,
and to that end also more liberally to construed
the constituted division and classification of
the powers of the coordinate branches of the
government and in so far as may not be clearly
inconsistent with the constitution.” (16Am Jur
2d., Sec. 98)
CONSTITUTIONS MUST BE CONSTRUED
TO REFERENCE THE COMMON LAW
“As to the construction, with reference
to Common Law, an important cannon of
construction is that constitutions must be
construed to reference to the Common Law.
The Common Law, so permitted destruction
of the abatement of nuisances by summary
proceedings, and it was never supposed that
a constitutional provision was intended to
interfere with this established principle, and
although there is no common law of the United
States in a sense of a national customary law as
distinguished from the common law of England,
19adopted in the several states. In interpreting the
Federal Constitution, recourse may still be had
to the aid of the Common Law of England. It has
been said that without reference to the common
law, the language of the Federal Constitution
could not be understood.” (16Am Jur 2d., Sec. 114)
“Various facts of circumstances extrinsic to
the constitution are often resorted to, by the
courts, to aid them and determining its meaning,
as previously noted however, such extrinsic aids
may not be resorted to where the provision
in the question is clear and unambiguous in
such a case the courts must apply the terms
of the constitution as written and they are not
at liberty to search for meanings beyond the
instrument.” (16Am Jur 2d., Sec. 117)
CONFLICTS. “In all instances, where the court
exercises its power to invalidate legislation on
constitutional grounds, the conflict of the statute,
with the constitution must be irreconcilable. Thus
a statute is not to be declared unconstitutional
unless so inconsistent with the constitution
that it cannot be enforced without a violation
thereof. A clear incompatibility between law and
the constitution must exist before the judiciary
is justified holding the law unconstitutional.
This principle is of course in line with the rule
that doubts as the constitutionality should be
resolved in favor of the constitutionality and the
beneficiary.” (16Am Jur 2d., Sec. 255)
BASIS OF ALL LAW. Nisi prius courts rely
on statutes—which is fiction of law, which seeks
to control the behavior of the sovereign people
who are under common law and not statutes,
and who ordained and established the law.
Therefore legislators cannot legislate the behav-
ior of the people.
20NO ONE IS BOUND
“No provision of the Constitution is designed
to be without effect. Anything that is in conflict
is null and void of law. Clearly, for a secondary
law to come in conflict with the supreme Law was
illogical, for certainly, the supreme Law would
prevail over all other laws, and certainly our
forefathers had intended that the supreme Law
would be the basis of all law, and for any law to
come in conflict would be null and void of law;
it would bare no power to enforce; it would bare
no obligation to obey; it would purport to settle
as if it had never existed; for unconstitutionality
would date from the enactment of such a law,
not from the date so branded in an open court
of law; no courts are bound to uphold it, and no
Citizens are bound to obey it. It operates as a
near nullity or a fiction of law.
“The general rule is that a unconstitutional
statute, whether Federal or State, though having
the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but
is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose,
since unconstitutionality dates from the time of
its enactment and not merely from the date of the
decision so branding it; an unconstitutional law,
in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had
never been passed. Such a statute lives a question
that it purports to settle, just as it would be had
the statute not ever been enacted. No repeal of an
enactment is necessary, since an unconstitutional
law is void. The general principles follows that
it imposes no duty, converse no rights, creates
no office, bestows no power of authority on
anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts
performed under it. A contract which rests on an
unconstitutional statute creates no obligation to
be impaired by subsequent legislation.
“No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional
21law. No courts are bound to enforce it. Persons
convicted and fined under a statute subsequently
held unconstitutional may recover the fines
paid. A void act cannot be legally inconsistent
with a valid one and an unconstitutional law
cannot operate to supersede an existing valid
law. Indeed, in so far as a statute runs counter to
the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded
thereby. Since an unconstitutional statute
cannot repeal, or in any way effect an existing
one, if a repealing statute is unconstitutional, the
statute which it attempts to repeal, remains in
full force and effect and where a statute in which
it attempts to repeal remains in full force and
effect and where a clause repealing a prior law is
inserted in the act, which act is unconstitutional
and void, the provision of the repeal of the
prior law will usually fall with it and will not be
permitted to operate as repealing such prior law.
“The general principle stated above applied
to the constitution as well as the laws of the
several states insofar as they are repugnant to
the constitution and laws of the United States.”
(16Am Jur 2d., Sec. 256)
CONGRESS CANNOT ALTER RIGHTS
“On the other hand, it is clear that Congress
cannot by authorization or ratification give the
slightest effect to a state law or constitution
which is in conflict with the Constitution of the
United States.” (16Am Jur 2d., Sec. 258)
RIGHTS DO NOT COME IN DEGREES
“Although it is manifested that an
unconstitutional provision in the statute is not
cured because included in the same act with
valid provisions and that there is no degree of
22constitutionality.” (16Am Jur 2d., Sec. 260)
STATES CANNOT LICENSE RIGHTS
“A state may not impose a charge for the
enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal
Constitution, and that a flat license tax here
involves restraints in advance the constitutional
liberties of Press and Religion and inevitably
tends to suppress their existence. That the
ordinance is non-discriminatory and that it
applies also to peddlers of wares and merchandise
is immaterial. The liberties granted by the first
amendment are in a preferred position. Since
the privilege in question is guaranteed by the
Federal Constitution and exists independently
of the state’s authority, the inquiry as to whether
the state has given something for which it
cannot ask a return, is irrelevant. No state may
convert any secured liberty into a privilege and
issue a license and a fee for it.” (Mudook v. Penn.
319 US 105, 1943)
“If the state does convert your right into
a privilege and issue a license and a fee for it,
you can ignore the license and a fee and engage
the right with impunity.” (Shuttlesworth v.
Birmingham AI. 373 US 262, 1962)
NO IMMUNITY. “The right of action created
by statute relating to deprivation under color of
law, of a right secured by the constitution and
the laws of the United States and comes claims
which are based solely on statutory violations
of Federal Law and applied to the claim that
claimants had been deprived of their rights,
in some capacity, to which they were entitled.”
(Owen v. lndependence 100 Vol. Supreme Court
Reports. 1398: [1982]; Main v. Thiboutot 100 Vol.
Supreme Court Reports. 2502, 1982)
23Judges are under the illusion that they have
absolute immunity, but all the cases that are
cited making such a claim are without authority
[people] and will fail in the federal and state
courts in a court of record. Only the people are
sovereign; all servants are under statutes and
therefore liable to USC 18 and 42. “Where there
is no jurisdiction, there can be no discretion;”
they are not above the law when they commit
a crime; they will go to jail and are subject to
civil suits. “No man in this country is so high
that he is above the law. No officer of the law
may set that law at defiance with impunity. All
the officers of the government, from the highest
to the lowest, are creatures of the law and are
bound to obey it…. It is the only supreme power
in our system of government, and every man
who, by accepting office participates in its
functions, is only the more strongly bound to
submit to that supremacy, and to observe the
limitations which it imposes on the exercise of
the authority which it gives.” (U.S. v. Lee, 106 U.S.
196, 220 1 S. Ct. 240, 261, 27 L. Ed 171; 1882)
“There is a general rule that a ministerial
officer who acts wrongfully, although in good
faith, is nevertheless liable in a civil action and
cannot claim the immunity of the sovereign.”
(Cooper v. O’Conner, 99 F.2d 133)
“Any judge who does not comply with his
oath to the Constitution of the United States
wars against that Constitution and engages in
acts in violation of the supreme law of the land.
The judge is engaged in acts of treason.” (Cooper
v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401; 1958)
“A judge must be acting within his jurisdiction
as to subject matter and person, to be entitled to
immunity from civil action for his acts.” (Davis v.
Burris, 51 Ariz. 220, 75 P.2d 689; 1938)
24“The courts are not bound by an officer’s inter-
pretation of the law under which he presumes to
act.” (Hoffsomer v. Hayes, 92 Okla 32, 227 F. 417)
“Where there is no jurisdiction, there can
be no discretion, for discretion is incident to
jurisdiction.” (Piper v. Pearson, 2 Gray 120, cited in
Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, 20 L.Ed. 646; 1872)
PREAMBLE The operative word is “establish”
and ordain. The People existed in their own
individual sovereignty before the constitution
was enabled. When the People “establish” a con-
stitution, there is nothing in the word “establish”
that signifies that they have yielded any of their
sovereignty to the agency they have created. To
interpret otherwise would convert the republic
into a democracy (Republic vs. Democracy).
GOVERNMENT
We the people are a Republic, not a democracy,
which is just the first step to an Oligarchy.
REPUBLICAN. One in which the powers
of sovereignty are vested in the people and
are exercised by the people, either directly, or
through representatives chosen by the people,
to whom those powers are specially delegated.
(In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219;
Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 22 L.Ed.
627. Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, p. 626)
DEMOCRACY. That form of government in
which the sovereign power resides in and is
exercised by the whole body of free citizens
directly or indirectly through a system of
representation, as distinguished from a
monarchy, aristocracy, or oligarchy. (Black’s Law
Dictionary, 5th Edition, p. 388; Bond v. U.S. SCOTUS
recognizes personal sovereignty, June 16, 2011)
25DUTY OF COURTS. “It is the duty of the
courts to be watchful for the Constitutional
rights of the citizen and against any stealthy
encroachments thereon.” (Boyd v. United States,
116 U.S. 616, 635)
“It will be an evil day for American Liberty
if the theory of a government outside supreme
law finds lodgment in our constitutional
jurisprudence. No higher duty rests upon this
Court than to exert its full authority to prevent all
violations of the principles of the Constitution.”
(Downs v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244; 1901)
“We (judges) have no more right to decline
the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than
to usurp that which is not given. The one or
the other would be treason to the Constitution.”
(Cohen v. Virginia, (1821), 6 Wheat. 264 and U.S. v.
Will, 449 U.S. 200)
“It may be that it is the obnoxious thing in
its mildest form; but illegitimate and unconsti-
tutional practices get their first footing in that
way; namely, by silent approaches and slight
deviations from legal modes of procedure. This
can only be obviated by adhering to the rule that
constitutional provisions for the security of per-
sons and property should be liberally construed.
A close and literal construction deprives them of
half their efficacy, and leads to gradual deprecia-
tion of the right, as if it consisted more in sound
than in substance. It is the duty of the Courts to
be watchful for the Constitutional Rights of the
Citizens, and against any stealthy encroachments
thereon. Their motto should be Obsta Principiis.”
(Boyd v. United, 116 U.S. 616 at 635; 1885)
COURTS OF RECORD
“Courts of record and courts not of record,
26the former being those whose acts and judicial
proceedings are enrolled, or recorded, for a
perpetual memory and testimony, and which
have power to fine or imprison for contempt.
Error lies to their judgments, and they generally
possess a seal. Courts not of record are those of
inferior dignity, which have no power to fine or
imprison, and in which the proceedings are not
enrolled or recorded.” (3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph.
Comm. 383; The Thomas Fletcher, C.C.Ga., 24 F.
481; Ex parte Thistleton, 52 Cal 225; Erwin v. U.S.,
D.C.Ga., 37 F. 488, 2 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis,
96 Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231)
AT LAW. [Bouvier’s Law] This phrase is
used to point out that a thing is to be done
according to the course of the common law; it
is distinguished from a proceeding in equity.
Any court that ignores due process; all statu-
tory courts ignore due process and is not a
common law court; common law courts are
“courts of record;” in all courts of record the
tribunal is the sovereign plaintiff(s) of the court
or the Jury. The Justice is the administrator
and reflects the wish of the sovereign, or jury,
because the people rule—not government ser-
vants. The following “Law of the Land” proves
this point.
“This Constitution, and the laws of the
United States which shall be made in pursuance
thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be
made, under the authority of the United States,
shall be the supreme law of the land; and the
judges in every state shall be bound thereby,
anything in the Constitution or laws of any
State to the contrary notwithstanding.
“Law of the land,” “due course of law,” and
“due process of law” are synonymous. (People
27v. Skinner, Cal., 110 P.2d 41, 45; State v. Rossi, 71 R.I.
284, 43 A.2d 323, 326; Direct Plumbing Supply Co. v.
City of Dayton, 138 Ohio St. 540, 38 N.E.2d 70, 72,
137 A.L.R. 1058; Stoner v. Higginson, 316 Pa. 481,
175 A. 527, 531.)
In a court of record the acts and judicial
proceedings are enrolled, whereas in courts not
of record, the proceedings are not enrolled. The
privilege of having these enrolled memorials
constitutes the great leading distinction between
courts of record and courts not of record.
To be a court of record a court must have four
characteristics, and may have a fifth; they are:
1) “A judicial tribunal having attributes and
exercising functions independently of the
person of the magistrate designated generally
to hold it.” (Jones v. Jones, 188 Mo.App. 220, 175
S.W. 227, 229; Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc. Mass., 171,
per Shaw, C.J. See, also, Ledwith v. Rosalsky, 244 N.Y.
406, 155 N.E. 688, 689 Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th
Ed., 425, 426 “Judges are magistrates” N.Y. CRC.
LAW § 30 : NY Code – Section 30)
2) “Proceeding according to the course of
common law.” (Jones v. Jones, 188 Mo.App. 220, 175
S.W. 227, 229; Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc. Mass., 171, per
Shaw, C.J. See, also, Ledwith v. Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155
N.E. 688, 689][Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426)
3) “Its acts and judicial proceedings are
enrolled, or recorded, for a perpetual memory
and testimony.” (3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm.
383; The Thomas Fletcher, C.C.Ga., 24 F. 481; Ex
parte Thistleton, 52 Cal 225; Erwin v. U.S., D.C.Ga.,
37 F. 488, 2 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis, 96 Ohio
St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231)
4) “Has power to fine or imprison for
contempt.” (3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm. 383;
The Thomas Fletcher, C.C.Ga., 24 F. 481; Ex parte
Thistleton, 52 Cal 225; Erwin v. U.S., D.C.Ga., 37 F. 488,
282 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis, 96 Ohio St. 205, 117
N.E. 229, 231. Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426)
5) “Generally possesses a seal.” (3 Bl. Comm. 24;
3 Steph. Comm. 383; The Thomas Fletcher, C.C.Ga.,
24 F. 481; Ex parte Thistleton, 52 Cal 225; Erwin v.
U.S., D.C.Ga., 37 F. 488, 2 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v.
Davis, 96 Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231.][Black’s
Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426)
The people of this State, as the successors
of its former sovereign, are entitled to all the
rights which formerly belonged to the King by
his prerogative. (Lansing v. Smith, 4 Wend. 9 (N.Y.)
(1829), 21 Am. Dec. 89 10C Const. Law Sec. 298; 18
C Em.Dom. Sec. 3, 228; 37 C Nav.Wat. Sec. 219; Nuls
Sec. 167; 48 C Wharves Sec. 3, 7.)
“A consequence of this prerogative is the
legal ubiquity of the king. His majesty in the
eye of the law is always present in all his courts,
though he cannot personally distribute justice.”
(Fortesc.c.8. 2Inst.186) “His judges are the
mirror by which the king’s image is reflected.”
(Blackstone’s Commentaries, 270.)
RIGHT TO PRACTICE LAW
“The term [liberty]…denotes not merely
freedom from bodily restraint but also the right
of the individual to contract, to engage in any
of the common occupations of life, to acquire
useful knowledge, to marry, to establish a home
and bring up children, to worship God according
to the dictates of this own conscience…. The
established doctrine is that this liberty may not
be interfered with, under the guise of protecting
public interest, by legislative action.” (Meyer v.
Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399, 400.)
“A State cannot exclude a person from the
practice of law or from any other occupation in
29a manner or for reasons that contravene the Due
Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
(Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232; 1957)
“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed
upon one because of his exercise of Constitutional
Rights.” (Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 2d 946; 1973)
“The practice of law cannot be licensed by
any state/State.” (Schware v. Board of Examiners,
United State Reports 353 U.S. pages 238, 239.)
“The practice of law is an occupation of com-
mon right.” (Sims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720; 1925)
“The assertion of federal rights, when plainly
and reasonably made, are not to be defeated
under the name of local practice.” (Davis v.
Wechler, 263 U.S. 22, 24; Stromberb v. California,
283 U.S. 359; NAACP v. Alabama, 375 U.S. 449)
“…The right to file a lawsuit pro se is one of the
most important rights under the constitution
and laws.” (Elmore v. McCammon (1986) 640 F.
Supp. 905)
RIGHT TO ASSIST. “Litigants can be assisted
by unlicensed laymen during judicial proceed-
ings.” ( Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel.
Virginia State Bar, 377 U.S. 1; v. Wainwright, 372 U.S.
335; Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425
“A next friend is a person who represents
someone who is unable to tend to his or her
own interest.” (Federal Rules of Civil Procedures,
Rule 17, 28 USCA “Next Friend)
“Members of groups who are competent non-
lawyers can assist other members of the group
achieve the goals of the group in court without
being charged with “unauthorized practice
of law.” (NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415); United
Mineworkers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715; and
Johnson v. Avery, 89 S. Ct. 747; 1969)
30“There, every man is independent of all
laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is
not bound by any institutions formed by his
fellowman without his consent.” (Cruden v.
Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E.)
“Under our system of government upon the
individuality and intelligence of the citizen, the
state does not claim to control him/her, except
as his/her conduct to others, leaving him/her
the sole judge as to all that affects himself/
herself.” (Mugler v. Kansas 123 U.S. 623, 659-60.)
“The assertion of federal rights, when plainly
and reasonably made, is not to be defeated
under the name of local practice.” (Davis v.
Wechsler, 263 US 22, at 24)
“A State may not impose a charge for the
enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal
Constitution.” (Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S.
105, at 113.)
“The State cannot diminish rights of the
people.” (Hertado v. California, 110 U.S. 516) “The
Claim and exercise of a Constitutional Right
cannot be converted into a crime.” (Miller v. U.S.,
230 F 2d 486. 489)
“If the state converts a liberty into a privilege
the citizen can engage in the right with impu-
nity” (Shuttlesworth v Birmingham , 373 USs 262)
FIRST PRINCIPALS. Liberty is mastered
in three powers: 1. Light (God); 2. Justice ,
synonymous with virtue (Judicial process); 3.
Rule of destiny (political process). Remove any
one and you lose Liberty. America has lost its
way and only a virtuous people can guide her
back. And so to that end, the People, by the
mercy of God, have rediscovered the common
[natural] law grand jury, and with His blessings
shall return America to her roots again.
31VIRTUE. Maxims of law avow that justice
and virtue are synonymous. Before a man can
implement justice he must first possess virtue,
which the Bible declares flows from the Lord
alone (Luke 6:19), and defines virtue as what-
soever things are true, honest, just, pure, lovely,
and of good report (Phil 4:8). The Lord further
expounds saying the wisdom that is from above
is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to
be entreated, full of mercy and good fruits, with-
out partiality, and without hypocrisy (James
3:17), and that he that follows after it establishes
righteousness and honor (Prov 21:21).
Thomas Jefferson understood this when he
said: “God who gave us life gave us liberty. And
can the liberties of a nation be thought secure
when we have removed their only firm basis, a
conviction in the minds of the people that These
liberties are of the gift of God? That they are
not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed, I
tremble for my country when I reflect that God
is just that His justice cannot sleep forever.”
George Washington understood this when he
said: “The favorable smiles of Heaven can never
be expected on a nation that disregards The
eternal rules of order and right which Heaven
itself has ordained.”
Benjamin Franklin understood this when
he said: “Only a virtuous people are capable
of freedom. As nations become corrupt and
vicious, they have more need of masters.”
John Adams understood this when he said:
“Our Constitution was made only for a moral
and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to
the government of any other.”
Patrick Henry understood this when he said:
32“It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too
often that this great nation was founded, not by
religionists, but by Christians; not on religions,
but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For this
very reason peoples of other faiths have been
afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of
worship here.”
James Madison understood this when he said:
“We have staked the whole future of American
civilization, not upon the power of government,
far from it. We have staked the future of all of
our political institutions upon the capacity of
mankind for self-government; upon the capac-
ity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to
control ourselves, to sustain ourselves accord-
ing to the Ten Commandments of God.”
Noah Webster understood this when he said:
“No truth is more evident to my mind than that
the Christian religion must be the basis of any
government intended to secure the rights and
privileges of a free people.” (Father of American
Scholarship and Education)
THE NAME GAME—PEOPLE OR CITIZEN
14th Amendment Article I, section 1:
“All persons born or naturalized in the
United States, and subject to the jurisdiction
thereof, are citizens of the United States and
of the State wherein they reside. No State shall
make or enforce any law which shall abridge
the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any State deprive any
person of life, liberty, or property, without due
process of law; nor deny to any person within
its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
NATION. In American constitutional law the
word “state” is applied to the several members
33of the American Union, while the word “nation”
is applied to the whole body of the people
embraced within the jurisdiction of the federal
government. (Cooley, Const.Lim. 1; Texas v. White,
7 Wall. 720, 19 L. Ed. 227.)
PRIVILEGE is merely an accessory of the debt
which it secures, and falls with the extinguish-
ment of the debt. (Black’s Law 4th edition, 1891)
PERSONS are divided by Law into natural and
artificial…“corporations” or “bodies politic.”
Quasi municipal corporations: bodies politic
and corporate, created for the sole purpose of
performing one or more municipal functions.
(Black’s Law 4th edition, 1891)
“WE THE PEOPLE of the United States, in
order to form a more perfect union, establish
justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide
for the common defense, promote the general
welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to
ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and
establish this Constitution for the United States
of America.”
PEOPLE are supreme, not the state. (Waring vs.
the Mayor of Savanah) ; The state cannot diminish
rights of the people. (Hertado v. California) ; …at
the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on
the people; and they are truly the sovereigns
of the country, but they are sovereigns without
subjects…with none to govern but themselves.
(Chisholm v. Georgia)
The people of this State, as the successors
of its former sovereign, are entitled to all the
rights which formerly belonged to the King by
his prerogative. (Lansing v. Smith)
ORDAIN. To enact a constitution or law.
(State v. Dallas City)
34KING is the sovereign, ruler, holds the highest
executive power, aka the People.
“Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject
to law, for it is the author and source of law;
but in our system, while sovereign powers
are delegated to the agencies of government,
sovereignty itself remains with the people, by
whom and for whom all government exists and
acts And the law is the definition and limitation
of power….” (Yick Wo v. Hopkins)
ONLY THE PEOPLE CAN SAVE AMERICA
“I know no safe depositary of the ultimate powers
of the society but the people themselves; and if we
think them not enlightened enough to exercise
their control with a wholesome discretion, the
remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform
their discretion by education. This is the true
corrective of abuses of constitutional power.”
—Thomas Jefferson
“Educate and inform the whole mass of the
people… They are the only sure reliance for the
preservation of our liberty.”
—Thomas Jefferson
“An enlightened citizenry is indispensable for the
proper functioning of a republic. Self-government
is not possible unless the citizens are educated
sufficiently to enable them to exercise oversight.
It is therefore imperative that the nation see to it
that a suitable education be provided for all its
citizens. It should be noted, that when Jefferson
speaks of “science,” he is often referring to
knowledge or learning in general.”
—Thomas Jefferson
35“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a
state of civilization, it expects what never was
and never will be.”
—Thomas Jefferson
FOURTH BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT. In
a stunning 6 to 3 decision, Justice Antonin
Scalia, writing for the majority, confirmed that
the American grand jury is neither part of the
judicial, executive nor legislative branches of
government, but instead belongs to the people.
It is in effect a fourth branch of government,
“governed” and administered to directly by
and on behalf of the American people, and its
authority emanates from the Bill of Rights. (See
United States -v- Williams)
In reality there is only one Grand Jury within a
state with locations in each county. We can draw
off the jury pool from any county if necessary.
When the administrators of each county come
together on an issue, they can use the seal of each
county on an arbitration or presentment docu-
ment which can produce extraordinary results.
But in order to be successful we must first
seek the blessings from the “GOVERNOR OF
THE UNIVERSE,” and build our endeavor
upon Him and His principles: (1) HONOR, (2)
JUSTICE, and (3) MERCY. This is the only sure
foundation; any other will succumb to tyrants.
“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and
religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the
government of any other.”
—John Adams
“Man will ultimately be governed by God
or by tyrants.”
—Benjamin Franklin
36CONSTITUTION OF A GRAND JURY. We the
people, by the mercy and Grace of God hav-
ing blessed us with the unalienable right of the
people as Grand Jurors, secured by the Fifth
Amendment of the Bill of Rights for the United
States of America, in order to establish justice,
insure domestic tranquility, secure the blessings
of liberty to ourselves and our posterity by the
securing of Natural Law, do ordain and estab-
lish this Grand Jury, principled upon Justice,
Honor and Grace for a perpetual administra-
tion of trust on behalf of the people.
DUTY OF THE GRAND JURY. If anyone’s
unalienable rights have been violated, or
removed, without a legal sentence of their peers,
from their lands, home, liberties or lawful right,
we [the twenty-five] shall straightway restore
them. And if a dispute shall arise concerning
this matter it shall be settled according to the
judgment of the twenty-five Grand Jurors, the
sureties of the peace. (Magna Carta, June 15, A.D.
1215, 52.)
JURIST OATH. I vow to the Governor of the
Universe, in my capacity as Jurist, to insure that
all public servants uphold the US Constitution
and Bill of Prohibitions (Rights); and to carry
out all of my deliberating under Natural Law;
principled under Justice, Honor, and Mercy;
and to strictly adhere to the following two legal
maxims: (1) Every right when withheld must have
a remedy, and every injury it’s proper redress,
and (2) In the absence of a victim there can be
no crime “corpus delecti”; the State cannot be the
victim. It is the duty of all the People to share in
the governing of themselves and to secure their
government by participating as a Jurist.
37THINK ABOUT THIS! If we the people can
reinstate Justice, and demand that elected
officials and bureaucrats obey the law or be
indicted, we would have then succeeded in
reinstating the Constitution!
Only the People can stand up and defend the
Constitution because the Constitution cannot
defend itself, and bureaucrats will never do it
PRAY AND STAND FOR JUSTICE
“Hold on, my friends, to the Constitution and the
Republic for which it stands. Miracles do not cluster,
and what has happened once in 6,000 years, may
not happen again. Hold on to the Constitution, for
if the American Constitution should fail, there will
be anarchy throughout the world.”
—Daniel Webster
“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of
human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is
the creed of slaves.”
—William Pitt, Nov. 18, 1783
“I would rather be exposed to the inconvenience
attending too much Liberty than those attending
too small degree of it.”
—Thomas Jefferson
GRAND JURY MISSION STATEMENT
Our mission is to restore the people to
sovereignty through knowledge, and only
then will they be armed with the virtue to take
political and judicial power. The people have it
in their power to disarm and defeat the enemy
of Liberty—both foreign and domestic—if they
only understood the principles of freedom and
stand upon them.
38To take political power is to control our
elected representatives, by bringing them into
obedience through fear of the people; this is
accomplished by understanding the office of
and becoming elected committeemen, and then
execute the powers. It’s that simple!
To take judicial power is to control our courts
by understanding jurisdiction, and bringing
into subjection all government officers and
officials using common law courts by opening
courts of record and executing “people”
authority. It’s that simple!
But, to successfully apply political and judicial
power you must have a sense of justice and
mercy, which is synonymous with virtue. And
to get virtue you need to have a relationship
with your Creator. If everyone exercised these
principles, America could shake off the chains
of tyranny, reinstate our republic, and bring
down the NWO “literally overnight.” This is the
only way to save the nation; without power you
are powerless! Join our endeavor and save our
Republic, one people at a time!
We are Non-Partisan. A partisan person is
“one who is blindly or unreasonably devoted
to party positions.” Therefore a partisan
cannot possibly serve the constitution. George
Washington warned us against political parties
when he said, “they only succeed in pitting one
group against another.”
The cause of the grassroots movement is the
awakening to our constitutional crisis, for to
be engaged in partisan politics would further
serve the demise of our constitutional republic.
The genius of the progressive movement is their
exploitation of partisan politics, which they
created to subvert our constitution. Grassroots
39groups are natural and spontaneous, whose
primary objective is to reinstate the constitution;
to be partisan would be counterproductive.
Traditional power structures are orchestrated
and designed to harness grassroots movements;
“they must always be suspect,” and will be
proven corrupt if they are partisan—divisive;
take control of choosing candidates.
Grassroots are founded locally, control is
local, and most events are local. To collaborate
with distant groups is necessary for unity, but
if events become dictated by them you are no
longer grassroots.
“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that
good men do nothing.”
—Edmund Burke
DECLARATION. We the people, by the
mercy and grace of God, ordained with certain
unalienable rights, among them the right to
form and exercise this 25-people Grand Jury in
the spirit of the Magna Carta and our founding
fathers, and in obedience to God for this county
on behalf of the people, having recorded our
authority with the County Clerk and the State
Supreme Court Chief Clerk, by which we act
in order to establish justice, insure domestic
tranquility, secure the blessings of liberty to
ourselves and our posterity, by the securing of
Natural Law, do hereby return Justice, Honor,
and Grace for a perpetual administration of
trust on behalf of the people hereby defined in
this handbook; “…so let the wicked perish at the
presence of God.” (Psalms 68:2)
40NO GOD, NO LIBERTY.
KNOW GOD, KNOW LIBERTY.
“If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall
be free indeed.”
— John 8:36
“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free…it
expects what never was and never will be.”
—Thomas Jefferson
“The favorable smiles of Heaven can never be
expected on a nation that disregards The eternal
rules of order and right which Heaven itself has
ordained.”
—George Washington
“God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the
liberties of a nation be thought secure when we
have removed their only firm basis, a conviction
in the minds of the people that These liberties
are of the gift of God? That they are not to be
violated but with His wrath? Indeed, I tremble for
my country when I reflect that God is just that His
justice cannot sleep forever.”
—Thomas Jefferson
“The worship of God is a duty.”
—Benjamin Franklin
“The fate of unborn millions will now depend,
under God, on the courage of this army, Our
cruel and unrelenting enemy leaves us only the
choice of brave resistance, or the most abject
submission, We have, therefore to resolve to
conquer or die.”
—George Washington
“I am sure that never was a people, who
had more reason to acknowledge a Divine
interposition in their affairs, than those of the
41United States; and I should be pained to believe
that they have forgotten that agency, which was
so often manifested during our Revolution, or
That they failed to consider the omnipotence of
that God who is alone able to protect them.”
—George Washington
“Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom.
As nations become corrupt and vicious, they
have more need of masters.”
—Benjamin Franklin
“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and
religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the
government of any other.”
—John Adams
“Statesmen, my dear Sir, may plan and speculate
for liberty, but It is religion and morality alone,
which can establish the principles upon which
freedom can securely stand. The only foundation
of a free constitution is pure virtue; and if this
cannot be inspired into our people in a greater
measure than they have it now, they may change
their rulers and the forms of government, but
they will not obtain a lasting liberty. They will
only exchange tyrants and tyrannies.”
—John Adams
“The safety and prosperity of nations ultimately
and Essentially depend on the protection and
blessing of Almighty God; and the national
acknowledgment of this truth is not only an
indispensable duty, which the people owe to him,
but a duty whose natural influence is favorable to
the Promotion of that morality and piety, without
which social happiness cannot exist, nor the
blessings of a free government be enjoyed.”
—John Adams
42“Observe good faith and justice towards all
Nations. Cultivate peace and harmony with all.
Religion and Morality enjoin this conduct; and can
it be that good policy does not equally enjoin it?…
Can it be that Providence has not connected the
permanent felicity of a Nation with its virtue?”
—George Washington
“Nothing can contribute to true happiness that is
inconsistent with duty; nor can a course of action
conformable to it, be finally without an ample
reward. For, God governs; and he is good.”
—Benjamin Franklin
“Happiness, whether in despotism or democracy,
whether in slavery or liberty, can never be found
without virtue.”
—John Adams
“It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too
often that this great nation was founded, not
by religionists, but by Gods children; not on
religions, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For
this very reason peoples of other faiths have been
afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of
worship here.”
—Patrick Henry
“It is the duty of every man to render to the Creator
such homage…Before any man can be considered
as a member of Civil Society, he must be considered
as a subject of the Governor of the Universe…”
—James Madison
“We have staked the whole future of American
civilization, not upon the power of government,
far from it. We have staked the future of all of
our political institutions upon the capacity of
mankind for self-government; upon the capacity
of each and all of us to govern ourselves,
43to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves
according to the Ten Commandments of God.”
—James Madison
“Religion, or the duty we owe to our Creator, and
manner of discharging it, can be directed only by
reason and conviction, not by force or violence.”
—James Madison
“Let it simply be asked where is the security for
prosperity, for reputation, for life, if the sense of
Religious obligation desert the oaths, which are
The instruments of investigation in the Courts of
Justice?”
—George Washington
“And let us with caution indulge the supposition,
that morality can be maintained without religion.”
—George Washington
“Whatever may be conceded to the influence of
refined education on minds of peculiar structure,
reason and experience both Forbid us to expect
that national morality can prevail in exclusion of
religious principle.”
—George Washington
“Tis substantially true, that Virtue or morality is a
necessary spring of popular government. “
—George Washington
“Though, in reviewing the incidents of my
Administration, I am unconscious of intentional
error, I am nevertheless too sensible of my
defects not to think it probable that I may have
committed many errors. Whatever they may
be I fervently beseech the Almighty to avert or
mitigate the evils to which they may tend.”
—George Washington
44Congress and President George Washington
in 1789 passed the “United States Annotated
Code,” Article III, which states: “Religion,
morality, and knowledge, being necessary to
good government and the happiness of man-
kind, schools and the means of education shall
forever be encouraged.”
“In my view, the Christian religion is the most
important and one of the first things in which
all children, under a free government ought to
be instructed…. No truth is more evident to my
mind than that the Christian religion must be the
basis of any government intended to secure the
rights and privileges of a free people.”
— Noah Webster
“The brief exposition of the constitution of the
United States, will unfold to young person’s the
principles of republican government; and it is the
sincere desire of the writer that our citizens should
early understand that The genuine source of cor-
rect republican principles is the Bible, particularly
the New Testament or the Christian religion.”
—Noah Webster
“The religion which has introduced civil liberty
is the religion of Christ and His apostles, which
enjoins humility, piety, and benevolence; which
acknowledges in every person a brother, or a
sister, and a citizen with equal rights. This is
genuine Christianity, and to this we owe our free
Constitutions of Government.”
—Noah Webster
“The moral principles and precepts contained in
the Scriptures ought to form the basis of all of our
civil constitutions and laws … All the miseries
and evils which men suffer from vice, crime,
ambition, injustice, oppression, slavery and war,
45proceed from their despising or neglecting the
precepts contained in the Bible.”
—Noah Webster
“If the citizens neglect their duty and place
unprincipled men in office, the government will
soon be corrupted; laws will be made not for the
public good so much as for the selfish or local
purposes.”
—Noah Webster
“Every master of slaves is born a petty tyrant.
They bring the judgment of heaven upon a
country. As nations cannot be rewarded or
punished in the next world, they must be in this.
By an inevitable chain of causes and effects,
Providence punishes national sins, by national
calamities.”
—George Mason
Father of our Bill of Rights, 1787
Common Law is our Heritage! Liberty is our
inheritance! We the people have been lulled
asleep; we have been robbed and persuaded
to sell our birthright. “Whoso looketh into the
perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he
being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work,
this man shall be blessed in his deed.” (James 1:25)
“My people are destroyed for lack of
knowledge….” (Hosea 4:6)
“Get wisdom, get understanding: forget it not;
neither decline from the words of my mouth.
Forsake her not, and she shall preserve thee:
love her, and she shall keep thee. Wisdom is the
principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all
thy getting get understanding. Exalt her, and she
shall promote thee: she shall bring thee to honour,
when thou dost embrace her.” (Prov 4:5-8)
46INDEX
Pg 3 Common law is common sense
Pg 3 Jury nullifi cation
Pg 5 Sheriff : top cop
Pg 7 United States codes
Pg 9 Government by consent
Pg 12 Th e real law
Pg 13 Rights and sovereignty
Pg 14 Licensing liberty
Pg 15 Remedy for every injury
Pg 16 Court
Pg 16 Judicial Notice
Pg 17 Law of the land
Pg 18 Interpretation
Pg 19 No martial law
Pg 19 Constitutions are common law
Pg 20 Basis of all law
Pg 21 No one is bound
Pg 22 Rights
Pg 23 No immunity
Pg 25 Government
Pg 26 duty of courts
Pg 26 Courts of record
Pg 29 Right to practice law
Pg 31 First principals
Pg 32 Virtue
Pg 33 Th e name game
Pg 35 Only the people can save America
Pg 36 4th Branch of government
Pg 37 Constitution of a grand jury
Pg 37 duty of the Grand Jury
Pg 37 Jurist Oath
Pg 38 Grand Jury mission statement
Pg 41 No god, no liberty.
47To order jurist handbooks go to:
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/jurist-handbook
NATURAL LAW
Love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and
with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the
first and great commandment. And the second
is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as
thyself. On these two commandments hang all
the law and the prophets. (Mat 22:37-40)
For more information, FREE civics course
covering American History, Constitution,
Common Law, Trial by Jury, to register as a
jurist in your county, or for contact information
for your local Common Law Grand Jury, visit
our website:
http://www.NationalLibertyAlliance.org
48

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Florida Power and Light, FPL


What has Florida Power and Light done [ FPL ], the company has for over the many decades,  run themselves out of the pocket of its consumers, the company has increased its price to make as much profit as is possible, with no regard for the ability of it clients to pay.
 
 
The company has no consideration to control its greed and need to make as much profit as it possibly can. This action is tantamount to cutting the same branch on which you sit, hoping they the branch will not fall, and if the branch does fall the company is making certain that it will not be hurt.
 
 
The company is comprised of a conglomerate of thousands of investors and other companies, some of these collectively are silent and never known to anyone outside of the inside clan of the company.
 
 
Profit by pillage and other illicit means is a common understanding and intention of this company. The conglomerate has done its level best to stop solar power from ever coming to be in common use anywhere in the country.
 
 
The company has a strangle hold on the people and the business people. The cost of power to run a small business is unsustainable, this cost is one of the main causes of small business failure, again it cutting the same branch on which it sits. If consumers cannot earn money how does the company hope to sell its product? then there are those automatic meters, the ones that are hated by all of its clients nationwide.
 
 
The company has no real regulator and it is vested with the legal means to do as it likes with respect to providing power for the citizens of the country.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Block the Israeli Zim Ship at the Port of Oakland, AF3IRM All African People’s Revolutionary Party (AAPRP) American Friends Service Committee American Muslims for Palestine ANSWER Coalition Arab Youth Organizing (AYO) AROC: Arab Resource & Organizing Center ASATA: Alliance of South Asians Taking Action AF3IRM All African People’s Revolutionary Party (AAPRP) American Friends Service Committee American Muslims for Palestine ANSWER Coalition Arab Youth Organizing (AYO) AROC: Arab Resource & Organizing Center ASATA: Alliance of South Asians Taking Action Bay Area Women in Black BAYAN-USA Bay Area CodePink Bay Area Latin America Solidarity Coalition Berkeley Fellowship of Unitarian Universalists Social Justice Committee Black Organizing Project (BOP) Black Organizing Leadership and Dignity (BOLD) Catalyst Project CodePink Washington Committee for Open Discussion of Zionism (CODZ) Communist Party of San Francisco Critical Resistance – LA Critical Resistance – Oakland Critical Resistance – Portland Descoloniza a Oakland/Decolonize Oakland Free Palestine Movement Freedom Archives Friends of Deir Ibzi’a Fuerza Mundial/Pueblos en Movimiento General Union of Palestine Students – SFSU Global Women’s Strike Gray Panthers of San Francisco Green Party of Alameda County Haiti Action Committee International Action Center International Jewish Anti Zionist Network International Socialist Organization International Tribunal of Conscience for Camilo ISM-Nor Cal IWW Bay Area Branch Jews for Palestinian Right of Return Justice for Palestinians La Voz de l@s trabajadores/Worker’s Voice Labor for Palestine Lake Merritt Neighbors Organized for Peace Malcolm X Grassroots Movement Marcha Patriotica (Colombia) – California chapter Middle East Children’s Alliance (MECA) Movement Generation National Lawyers Guild SFBA Chapter Noam Chomsky NorCal Friends of Sabeel Occupy SF Action Council ONYX Organizing Committee The Palestine-Israel Action Committee Palestinian Youth Movement Queers Undermining Israeli Terror Samidoun Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network San Francisco Green Party Socialist Organizer SOUL: School of Unity and Liberation Stanford Students for Justice Students for Justice in Palestine – Cal Totally Radical Muslims US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation US Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott US Palestinian Community Network Veterans For Peace Chapter 69 World Can’t Wait Bay Area Workers World Party Xicana Moratorium Bay Area Women in Black Bay Area CodePink Bay Area Latin America Solidarity Coalition Berkeley Fellowship of Unitarian Universalists Social Justice Committee Black Organizing Project (BOP) Black Organizing Leadership and Dignity (BOLD) Catalyst Project CodePink Washington Committee for Open Discussion of Zionism (CODZ) Communist Party of San Francisco Critical Resistance – LA Critical Resistance – Oakland Critical Resistance – Portland Descoloniza a Oakland/Decolonize Oakland Free Palestine Movement Freedom Archives Friends of Deir Ibzi’a Fuerza Mundial/Pueblos en Movimiento General Union of Palestine Students – SFSU Global Women’s Strike Gray Panthers of San Francisco Green Party of Alameda County Haiti Action Committee International Action Center International Jewish Anti Zionist Network International Socialist Organization International Tribunal of Conscience for Camilo ISM-Nor Cal IWW Bay Area Branch Jews for Palestinian Right of Return Justice for Palestinians La Voz de l@s trabajadores/Worker’s Voice Labor for Palestine Lake Merritt Neighbors Organized for Peace Malcolm X Grassroots Movement Marcha Patriotica (Colombia) – California chapter Middle East Children’s Alliance (MECA) Movement Generation National Lawyers Guild SFBA Chapter Noam Chomsky NorCal Friends of Sabeel Occupy SF Action Council ONYX Organizing Committee The Palestine-Israel Action Committee Palestinian Youth Movement Queers Undermining Israeli Terror Samidoun Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network San Francisco Green Party Socialist Organizer SOUL: School of Unity and Liberation Stanford Students for Justice Students for Justice in Palestine – Cal Totally Radical Muslims US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation US Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott US Palestinian Community Network Veterans For Peace Chapter 69 World Can’t Wait Bay Area Workers World Party Xicana Moratorium


Block the Israeli Zim Ship at the Port of Oakland

August 16, 2014
URGENT UPDATE:
Our organizing is working! The Zim ship has been delayed and is scheduled to arrive in the afternoon shift. 
MEET AT WEST OAKLAND BART @ 3pm NOT 5am
Come louder and stronger!
 
Stop Israel at the Port!
Zionism isn’t welcome in our Town!

Block the Israeli Zim Ship at the Port of Oakland
Saturday, August 16th,5am
meet @ West Oakland Bart and march to Berth 57

Participants:Those planning to participate: subscribe to text-alerts and receive live updates about the 8/16 Block the Boat,  text “join” to (510) 346-5951.

Livestream:
KFPA will be livestreaming the action at www.kpfa.org/kpfa-live-stream-channel.
Also follow @BlocktheBoat for live tweets.

Volunteers and Support: Fill out form to volunteer with transportation assistance.  Email info [at] araborganizing.org to support with food donations. Contact AROC to pick up posters and postcards for outreach.

Donations: Donate here to help with event costs. 

click link to go to original site;

http://www.mecaforpeace.org/events/block-israeli-zim-ship-port-oakland

What’s happening?
The world has watched in horror as Israel has continued to bombard and devastate Gaza. Millions around the globe have come out in support of the Palestinian people and against the Zionist regime, holding massive marches, demonstrations, and actions. Here in the Bay, San Francisco witnessed some of the biggest mobilizations in recent years, with a series of marches, each bringing out thousands of people. It’s time to step it up.

Call to Action
Palestine is calling us to action! Palestinians laborers, Palestinian General Federation Trade Union (PGFTU), have called on workers around the world to refuse to handle Israel goods. Palestinians throughout Gaza, the West Bank and 1948 Palestine have demonstrated their unity in the struggle against Apartheid Israel and have taken to the streets in the tens of thousands, bravely facing Israeli military armed with US made weapons to call on the international community to stand with them as they resist Zionism throughout all of historic Palestine. We will be answering this call by organizing community pickets at the Port of Oakland, asking the longshoreman to honor this request and to stand with the people of Palestine as they have done in the past.

Historical Background
During apartheid in South Africa, ILWU workers made history when they refused to unload South African cargo in San Francisco in 1984. This action was a major catalyst for international anti-apartheid solidarity and struggle worldwide. In 2010, after a Turkish flotilla, the Mavi Marmara, was attacked by Israel for attempting to bring humanitarian aid to Gaza, we built on ILWU’s history and successfully blocked the Israeli Zim ship from being unloaded at the Port of Oakland – the first time in US history an Israeli ship was blocked. We will be continuing this legacy by organizing to block the Israeli ship once again. And just as apartheid fell in South Africa, so too it will fall in Israel!

Sustained BDS in the Bay
If there is one thing that the latest Israeli attacks show, it’s the power of Palestinian resilience. The resistance in Gaza is still alive and thriving, despite Israel’s ongoing attempts to destroy it. But we should always remember that the Palestinian resistance did not begin with Israel’s latest bombardment, nor did it begin during the last bombardment. It has been going on since 1948, since Israel came into existence. And it will not cease until Israeli apartheid falls.

We refuse to allow Israel to conduct its business as usual, here in the Bay and everywhere!

Every Saturday, the Israeli owned Zim shipping line docks and unloads its cargo at the Port of Oakland. Let this action be the beginning of a sustained campaign to stop the Israeli ship from ever unloading in our town.

From Seattle to Oakland to Los Angeles – turn the Israeli ship around!

Long Beach Block the Boat Action
Tacoma and Seattle Block the Boat Action
New York Block the Boat Action

Not in Palestine
Not in the Bay
Not Anywhere
Stand Against Zionism Everywhere

Endorsed by:

AF3IRM
All African People’s Revolutionary Party (AAPRP)
American Friends Service Committee
American Muslims for Palestine
ANSWER Coalition
Arab Youth Organizing (AYO)
AROC: Arab Resource & Organizing Center
ASATA: Alliance of South Asians Taking Action
AF3IRM
All African People’s Revolutionary Party (AAPRP)
American Friends Service Committee
American Muslims for Palestine
ANSWER Coalition
Arab Youth Organizing (AYO)
AROC: Arab Resource & Organizing Center
ASATA: Alliance of South Asians Taking Action
Bay Area Women in Black
BAYAN-USA
Bay Area CodePink
Bay Area Latin America Solidarity Coalition
Berkeley Fellowship of Unitarian Universalists Social Justice Committee
Black Organizing Project (BOP)
Black Organizing Leadership and Dignity (BOLD)
Catalyst Project
CodePink Washington
Committee for Open Discussion of Zionism (CODZ)
Communist Party of San Francisco
Critical Resistance – LA
Critical Resistance – Oakland
Critical Resistance – Portland
Descoloniza a Oakland/Decolonize Oakland
Free Palestine Movement
Freedom Archives
Friends of Deir Ibzi’a
Fuerza Mundial/Pueblos en Movimiento
General Union of Palestine Students – SFSU
Global Women’s Strike
Gray Panthers of San Francisco
Green Party of Alameda County
Haiti Action Committee
International Action Center
International Jewish Anti Zionist Network
International Socialist Organization
International Tribunal of Conscience for Camilo
ISM-Nor Cal
IWW Bay Area Branch
Jews for Palestinian Right of Return
Justice for Palestinians
La Voz de l@s trabajadores/Worker’s Voice
Labor for Palestine
Lake Merritt Neighbors Organized for Peace
Malcolm X Grassroots Movement
Marcha Patriotica (Colombia) – California chapter
Middle East Children’s Alliance (MECA)
Movement Generation
National Lawyers Guild SFBA Chapter
Noam Chomsky
NorCal Friends of Sabeel
Occupy SF Action Council
ONYX Organizing Committee
The Palestine-Israel Action Committee
Palestinian Youth Movement
Queers Undermining Israeli Terror
Samidoun Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network
San Francisco Green Party
Socialist Organizer
SOUL: School of Unity and Liberation
Stanford Students for Justice
Students for Justice in Palestine – Cal
Totally Radical Muslims
US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation
US Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott
US Palestinian Community Network
Veterans For Peace Chapter 69
World Can’t Wait Bay Area
Workers World Party
Xicana Moratorium
Bay Area Women in Black
Bay Area CodePink
Bay Area Latin America Solidarity Coalition
Berkeley Fellowship of Unitarian Universalists Social Justice Committee
Black Organizing Project (BOP)
Black Organizing Leadership and Dignity (BOLD)
Catalyst Project
CodePink Washington
Committee for Open Discussion of Zionism (CODZ)
Communist Party of San Francisco
Critical Resistance – LA
Critical Resistance – Oakland
Critical Resistance – Portland
Descoloniza a Oakland/Decolonize Oakland
Free Palestine Movement
Freedom Archives
Friends of Deir Ibzi’a
Fuerza Mundial/Pueblos en Movimiento
General Union of Palestine Students – SFSU
Global Women’s Strike
Gray Panthers of San Francisco
Green Party of Alameda County
Haiti Action Committee
International Action Center
International Jewish Anti Zionist Network
International Socialist Organization
International Tribunal of Conscience for Camilo
ISM-Nor Cal
IWW Bay Area Branch
Jews for Palestinian Right of Return
Justice for Palestinians
La Voz de l@s trabajadores/Worker’s Voice
Labor for Palestine
Lake Merritt Neighbors Organized for Peace
Malcolm X Grassroots Movement
Marcha Patriotica (Colombia) – California chapter
Middle East Children’s Alliance (MECA)
Movement Generation
National Lawyers Guild SFBA Chapter
Noam Chomsky
NorCal Friends of Sabeel
Occupy SF Action Council
ONYX Organizing Committee
The Palestine-Israel Action Committee
Palestinian Youth Movement
Queers Undermining Israeli Terror
Samidoun Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network
San Francisco Green Party
Socialist Organizer
SOUL: School of Unity and Liberation
Stanford Students for Justice
Students for Justice in Palestine – Cal
Totally Radical Muslims
US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation
US Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott
US Palestinian Community Network
Veterans For Peace Chapter 69
World Can’t Wait Bay Area
Workers World Party
Xicana Moratorium

 
Posted in Israel | Tagged , | Leave a comment

An honest Israeli Jew tells the Real Truth about Israel


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etXAm-OylQQ

Published on Dec 2, 2012

Miko Peled was born in Jersusalem into a famous and influential Israeli Zionist family. His father was a famous General in the Israeli Army, of which Miko also served his time. When Miko’s niece was killed by Palestinian suicide bombers, you may have expected the family to put Palestinians at fault, but surprisingly they blamed the state of Israel, and their violent torturing and persecution for driving people to such sadness that they would take their own lives.

Through his father’s deep knowledge of the Israeli war of terror, together with his own research, Miko Peled ruins the myths surrounding the Israel and Palestine situation, and delivers a truth so damning that many Jews and Israel supporters will not be able to bear it. He reveals facts such as the original expelled Jews are not the ones returning, and they are not their descendants either, covers the double standards regarding the right of return, which doesn’t apply to Palestinians, and dispels the myth that there has been a conflict for ages by producing proof that it was peaceful up until 1947 when Israel launched their illegal attacks.

Miko is just one of the many modern day Jews against Zionism and the state of Israel, and with the information he delivers in this astounding talk, it is not difficult to see why more and more Jews are rejecting Zionism and calling for the dismantling of Israel. It is a true eye-opener for anyone who has for too long been blinded by the fake misinformation given by the mainstream media, and the truths come straight from the heartland where he has spent many years documenting the real story.

Uploaded by http://www.muslimsandtheworld.com

Original clip is located at http://www.muslimsandtheworld.com/an-…

Link to this clip on Youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etXAm-…

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment